Rhino Records HomeStore News And Notes Fun About Rhino Help My Cart
CDs DVD and Video Vinyl Store Collectibles: Rhino HandmadeWireless: Music for your cell phone
Newsletter

Sign up here and we'll let you know what’s up

(optional)
HTML Text

[10] comments


Environmental Defense

A Science-Based Approach to Global Warming

by Janet Schulman and Nancy Neuman

Traffic

"Environmental Defense is a very important organization. We rely on them to a great extent, not only for help in lobbying, but in providing us with the information that we need." —Senator John McCain

Global Warming

When someone asks you to help save the world, they're almost always exaggerating. But if you listen to what scientists are saying about global warming lately, you might just feel like slipping into your Superman costume.

The first thing you need to know is that we can still stop it. But we've got to act fast.

The hard evidence from satellite photos, scientific studies, and atmospheric samples suggests we've got to start cutting carbon pollution within 10 years, if we don't want things to spin out of control. If we don't, we'll see more of what's already happening around us: more deadly heat waves, more severe droughts and more intense hurricanes.

What's happening is that as we burn oil and coal, the carbon dioxide pollution builds up in the atmosphere and traps heat. That's throwing off the whole climate system of the planet.

So we at Environmental Defense are working to reduce the world's use of oil and coal, and encourage people to use cleaner fuels and more efficient technologies.

We're working with innovative businesses like FedEx Express, the world's largest express transportation company, to make that happen. Together, we developed a dramatically cleaner delivery truck that goes 57% further on each gallon of gas, reducing global warming pollution, as well as oil dependency, fueling costs and air pollution. The first set of the new hybrid-electric trucks has already hit the roads.

Environmental Defense is also working with legislative leaders to change America's national policies. Together, we are working toward a national limit on global warming pollution, coupled with economic incentives for American industry to unleash the new energy economy that will ultimately solve the problem.

pollution

Why Environmental Defense?

"Finding the ways that work." That's the Environmental Defense motto, and it's the practical, science-based approach that sets us apart.

We take an uncommon approach to environmental advocacy: showing how economic growth and a healthy planet can go hand in hand.

With more Ph.D. scientists and economists than any similar group, we don't just point out problems. We create solutions.

It's one of the reasons we've been successful working with politicians from all sides, as well as business leaders, ranchers, farmers, fishermen, and local communities to find workable solutions to the world's biggest environmental problems. Now, we're putting that expertise to work to win the fight against global warming.

What You Can Do

As the old proverb says: "The journey of 1000 miles starts with a single step." You can take that step now on behalf of the environment—tell Congress we need action now. Join the thousands of Americans calling on our political leaders to stop talking and start fighting global warming. Send an email to your U.S. senators and representative.

We'd also be honored if you would take the next step and make a generous donation in support of our Fight Global Warming campaign. With your help, we will enlist mainstream America in the effort to better conserve energy and cut emissions. In Washington, we will work the halls of Congress until our national leaders take meaningful action to cap our global warming pollution.

By adding first your voice then your generous donation to our campaign, you will be joining a movement to change the course of history—to save this planet from the worst consequences of global warming. We have the technology and the tools we need to fight global warming—all we need now is public support and the political will to act.

Polar Bear

About Environmental Defense

Environmental Defense was started over 35 years ago after a small group of scientists fought and won a battle against the pesticide DDT. With a staff of more than 300 people and an annual budget over $50 million, Environmental Defense leads the way in the fight to save our planet.

Our four main focuses include:

  • 1. Clean the Air-Stabilizing the Earth's climate by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
  • 2. Eco System Restoration-Restoring ecosystems, including species, habitat, rivers and watersheds. For example, we work with landowners to restore critical habitat for endangered species.
  • 3. Health- Nanotechnology- Protecting health by reducing exposure to toxic chemicals and pollution. We've partnered with DuPont to guarantee the safe use of nanotechnology, and clean up diesel vehicles like trucks and school buses.
  • 4. Oceans Alive-Safeguarding the oceans from pollution and overfishing. We're working to improve the health of our fisheries; get sustainable, healthy seafood on the market; and inform consumers with tools like our seafood selector, which helps you pick seafood that's good for you (low in toxics like mercury, PCBs, etc) and for the environment.
  • Some Notable Environmental Defense Victories:

    1967: A small group of scientists incorporates our organization as the Environmental Defense Fund after winning a battle against the pesticide DDT.

    1970: We help bring all hunted whales onto the U.S. endangered species list.

    1985: We convince federal regulators to phase lead out of gasoline.

    1990: The new Clean Air Act incorporates our innovative market-based methods to cut air pollution, leading to less acid rain.

    1991: McDonald's accepts the recommendations of our joint task force, eliminating a cumulative total of more than 150,000 tons of packaging waste.

    1996: We help the Panará Indians of Brazil win protection for their homeland, protecting 1.2 million acres of Amazonian rainforest from deforestation.

    2000: Environmental Defense partners with eight leading companies to cut global warming pollution.

    2001: Environmental Defense empowers nearly 1 million individuals to take action globally and in their own communities through its ActionNetwork.org web site, and provides detailed environmental information for every Zip code in America on its Scorecard.org web site.

    2002: We encourage New York Governor George Pataki to sign an executive order requiring diesel-powered equipment at the World Trade Center reconstruction site use clean fuel technologies to reduce pollutants in Lower Manhattan. Within several months, this requirement spreads throughout all of New York City and becomes a model for other localities as well.

    2003: With our backing, in part through the launch of the Global Warming: Undo It campaign, the bipartisan Climate Stewardship Act (sponsored by Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman) wins unexpectedly strong support from 43 senators on its first vote in the Senate. This strong showing marks a shift in political momentum on global warming in the United States.

    2004: FedEx Express's new hybrid electric delivery trucks, spurred by Environmental Defense and developed by Eaton Corporation, take to the streets in Sacramento, New York City and Tampa, Florida. The trucks, which reduce emissions by up to 90% and cut fuel use some 57%.

    2005: Ranchers, farmers and other private landowners enroll more than 3 million acres in Safe Harbor programs Environmental Defense developed to protect endangered wildlife.

    2006: In partnership with us, two leading food companies, Wegmans Food Markets and Bon Appétit Management Company, unveil a purchasing policy for farm-raised salmon that requires suppliers to meet tough health and environmental standards.


    LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

    A word about submissions: We post what you give us, so please don't include your email address or any personal info. Your comments reach Rhino, not necessarily the writer, so don't expect a reply from them (or us, see our help section for contact info). We gather and post your submissions in batches, so do expect a short delay. And don't get bent if we edit your comments. We probably won't, but we reserve that right.


    Comments:

    If groups like yours would stop this bullshit we wouldn't be paying so much for gas. We would be drilling and refining our own supplies. The United States should have more nuclear power plants and we wouldn't have to worry about energy shortages. This planet will be here long after we're gone.

    We can bring new oil and natural gas wells to market withoug harming the planet---and we must do this to continue a healthy economy. While we should develop new fuels we must not ingnore our God-given bounty of natural resources here at home. Please contact your Congressperson and tell them to support drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf and Alaska Natrual Wild Life Regfuge. Groups like the Enviromental Defense Fund try to mask their disgust for democratic capitalism under the guise of "caring for the enviroment. Don't fall for it!

    Maybe you could use your scientists to engineer a way to move the planet a few million miles further away from the sun. 25 years ago alarmists warned of a new ice age, now its warming. one thing is for sure--you keep funding your $50 million budget with scare tactics. Hybrids use more energy to build; ethanol uses more energy and water to produce than it's worth. Oil is still the best form of energy for transportation, and we should be drilling for more of it in the US. I'm wasting my time though, because it is all about money with environmental defense lobbies. I'd bet your principals don't live in 1000 sq. foot houses.

    thank you

    thanks for the info

    You are so right in getting people to take action against global warming. There are people still out there that need to be convinced that global warming does exist and to take it seriously in order to protect future interests for earth and the millions of people in it.

    How many Republicans like John McCain say good things about Environmental Defense? shouldn't your political agenda prevent you from having tax-deductible status? Sounds pretty scary..

    great article!

    To the folks commenting here: If you don't believe in global warming, you aren't getting the facts. Here's an interesting quote from Lawrence Lessig's piece on "An Inconvenient Truth" in this month's Wired Magazine. 'About halfway through, Gore cites two studies to explain why so many people remain so skeptical about global warming. The first looked at a random sample of almost 1,000 abstracts on climate change in peer-reviewed scientific journals from 1993 to 2003 and found that exactly zero doubted “that we’re causing global warming.” The second surveyed a random sample of more than 600 articles about global warming in popular media between 1988 and 2002 and discovered that 53 percent questioned “that we’re causing global warming.”

    Good journalism likes two sides to every story. Lazy journalism fails to distinguish between objective sources and interested parties – and this issue has interested parties aplenty, from ­industry-funded think tanks to hired PR firms, feeding the press the disinformation it needs to make the story sound balanced.' It would be great if more of you would check out the science, rather than getting a list of talking points from the interested parties that want to keep you misinformed. But some of you don't seem to need lobbyists to help spread disinformation, you The EDF actually promotes safe nuclear power (http://www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentid=4470) as a possible key to "slowing the emissions that contribute to global warming".

    After Al Gore's movie / commercial for his bid for a 2008 Presential run, I kept hearing of just a many scientists denying anything about global warming. I don't care who you are, this is always going to be an issue that will not be agreed on by a majority, and even if it is...doesn't make it so.

    I hear Liberals complaining about the price of gasoline, which makes me wonder why they are taking part in destroying the atomosphere (as stated above).
    Let Chevron drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, go ahead with drilling in the artic circle ( KEEP BOTH CLOSELY MONITORED).

    You can't have low gas prices, unless we start producing more of our own.

    Alternative sources of energy..fuel cells, corn, sugar.

    The price for gasoline using corn of sugar will be astronimical.

    Fuel cells, and solar power stuff..., as it starts to catch on, along comes ExxonMobil / Conoco-Philips / BP ec, and they buy up these companies.

    Hybrids are so expensive now, who can afford them. Much like calculators which cost over $100.00 when they first came out, are now very cheap.

    Good Luck with your efforts.




    Let I Bleed Book

    What's Inside the Rhino Magazine

    Subscribe to Feed

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    home :: news & notes :: store :: about rhino :: fun stuff :: help :: my cart :: privacy policy :: terms of service